Archive for the ‘Books and Literature’ Category

A good theological library is something no Christian minister or leader should be without. In fact, I believe all Christians should have some form of theological library, though not all Christians will need a library to rival that of a seminary professor or scholar.

Even so, unless you are wealthy and can purchase books at will, you’re going to need to think seriously about what books you buy, and how you buy them. These are my tips for building a good theological library on a budget.

Continue reading here.


I know some people are surprised by the fact that I like reformed rap and Christian hip hop. To be honest, I was not initially drawn to its style, but to its theological content. I began to appreciate the style more after the fact. And as I see more depth and more theology in its lyrics, I love the genre even more. To give you an example, I want to examine the song “Take up and Read” from Shai Linne’s recent album “Lyrical Theology: Part 1.”

The song itself is an exhortation for Christians to follow the example of Augustine and “take up and read, take up and read!” And it is full of well-crafted lyrics that allude to various books and authors. I have compiled a list of these, roughly in the order they appear (I’ve excluded some duplicates, John Piper’s “Desiring God” is referenced twice) in the song. I recommend you listen carefully to the songs lyrics, then look at this list and listen to the song again. This is the only way you’ll appreciate lyrics like “I’ll shout out a van ’til they hear the defense of the faith” or “B, we’re in a war field.” These references are woven flawlessly into the lyric, and if you don’t listen carefully you won’t catch many of them!

Take up and read – From Augustine’s “Confessions.”

Bondage of the Will – By Martin Luther

Desiring God – By John Piper

Religious Affections – By Jonathan Edwards

Table Talks – By Martin Luther

B.B. Warfield – Old Princeton Theologian

Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God – Jonathan Edwards

Forgotten Trinity – By James White

Reverence and Awe – D.G. Hart and John Muether

Pursuit of Holiness – Jerry Bridges

Lord of the Rings – J.R.R. Tolkien

Carl Trueman – Professor at Westminster Theological Seminary

The Gospel According to Jesus – John MacArthur

The Truth War – John MacArthur

Made in Our Image – Steven J. Lawson

Redemption: Accomplished and Applied – John Murray

Art for God’s Sake – Philip Ryken

The Defense of the Faith – Cornelius Van Til

The Pleasures of God – John Piper

“Amazing Grace” – By John Newton

Lectures to My Students – C.H. Spurgeon

Preaching and Preachers – D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Reformed Pastor – Richard Baxter

The Godly Man’s Picture – Thomas Watson

The Mystery of Providence – John Flavel

The Bible and the Future – Anthony Hoekema

Chosen by God – R.C. Sproul

Holiness – By John C. Ryle

The Cross of Christ – John Stott

The Glory of Christ – John Owen

Mere Christianity – C.S. Lewis

The Valley of Vision – Collection of Puritan Prayers/Devotions

Repentance – C. John Miller

The Mortification of Sin – John Owen

A Praying Life – Paul Miller and David Powlison

Knowledge of the Holy – A.W. Tozer

Knowing God – J.I. Packer

The Sovereignty of God – A.W. Pink

I don’t know that this list is exhaustive, I hope I have not missed any allusions, but it’s quite possible I did. The whole song is an example of lyrical and literary genius. Now take up and read!


As I got online tonight, an article on my MSN homepage caught my attention:  It was a picture of an ancient papyrus with a caption below it reading “Did Jesus Have a Wife?”  I mentally sighed as I thought about having to deal with a new round of Dan Brown style conspiracy theories.  I read the article, knowing I would soon be asked about this find.

This issue is important for several reasons.  If Jesus had a wife, serious questions are raised about the reliability of the Canonical Gospels, why wouldn’t they mention such a fact?  Why has the dominant tradition throughout chuch history not recognized this marriage?  Would there be something that the church was trying to hide?  If Jesus was married, does this compromise the Christian Gospel?

These are the sorts of questions Jesus being married would raise.  But was Jesus actually married?  It is my position, and I believe this is the historically accurate view, that Jesus was not married.  We need to take these sorts of positions based on evidence, not on wild conspiracy or sensationist reporting.  We will now briefly turn to this evidence.

First, notice that the papyrus itself is from the 4th Century.  This is very important.  As we all know, various false teachings and myths about Christ had begun to arise by the 4th Century.  There was no lack of heretics at this time.  In fact, there was no lack of heretics in the 1st and 2nd Centuries.  So supposing this papyrus is authentic (and based on the information I now have, it does not seem to be a forgery), it is not very early historically speaking.  The Canonical Gospels have manuscript fragments that have been dated to the 1st Century for Mark, and to the early 2nd Century for John.  Now if John was the last Gospel written, and most scholars believe it was, that means it was likely written 95 AD at latest.  The other Gospels date even earlier than this, likely to the 60s AD.  Thus all four of the Canonical Gospels are 1st Century documents, some of which have manuscript fragments from that same century!

In contrast, this new papyrus is from the 4th Century, and Karen King believes it is a copy of a 2nd Century text.  Thus, in terms of when the original works were written and the span of time to the first surviving manuscripts, the Canonical Gospels compare incredibly favorably in historical terms.  We are looking at 1st Century documents with at least one manuscript fragment from that same century and comparing them to (at best) a 2nd Century text with only one small manuscript fragment some 200 years later.  There should be no question on these grounds about which texts offer better historical information about Jesus Christ:  The Canonical Gospels win the historical battle, far and away.

Second, notice that the new papyrus is very small and the information on it incomplete.  That the manuscript reads “‘Jesus said to them, ‘My wife …'” really proves nothing historically.  It MAY indicate that some sect beginning in the late 2nd Century proposed Jesus was married, but this is not even much of a new claim (remember what I said about Dan Brown?).  But there’s not very compelling reasons to suppose the text has to be read this way.  Perhaps the full manuscript has Jesus referring to the Church as His wife.  This is not an implausible idea, given that in the New Testament one of the most common terms for the Church is the “Bride” of Christ.  The simple fact is we don’t know what this manuscript actually says when completed.  But even if it postulates that Jesus had a literal wife, why should we believe this one sole, late manuscript over the earlier and better authenticated witness of the Canonical Gospels, of the Pauline Epistles, of Peter, of John, of Jude, of James?  Are we to believe that NONE of these people who were closest to Jesus thought it relevant to mention the fact that Jesus had a wife?  This is especially the case in light of 1 Corinthians 9:5; if Paul knew Jesus had a wife, surely he would add this in the question, since he does add Jesus’ brothers in this question.

Third, the papyrus raises a question about whether Jesus had a woman disciple.  This is quite easy to answer:  Jesus had many women disciples, and the New Testament records as much (such as in Luke 8:1-3).  In the letter of Pliny the Younger to the Emperor Trajan, Pliny writes about interrogating certain female deacons to discover more about Christian beliefs and practices.  The earliest discoveries of the empty tomb following Christ’s crucifixion are, in each Gospel, made by women!  Certainly there is no question about whether Jesus had women disciples.  I think what people really want to know is if Jesus had women apostles (among, or in equal standing with, the 12 Apostles).  We can state, quite quickly, that there were no women among the 12 Apostles.  But women did play a prominent role in the early church.  Whether there were actually women apostles in the New Testament really depends on Romans 16:7, and this current papyrus doesn’t shed any light on that.

In the end, I felt compelled to write this not because of the papyrus itself, but because I’m anticipating what our society will do with this discovery.  Sensationalist reporters, ill-informed skeptics, and questioning seekers will begin wondering of the Church’s view of the historical Jesus remains a legitimate option.  People will make speculations about Jesus being married to Mary Magdalene.  People will say the early Gospel writers attempted a cover up, and that the Church has carried on the cover up.  In light of the wild claims that will be forthcoming (despite Karen King’s best efforts to urge caution to the media), we as Christians have to be ready to give an answer for the hope that is within us.  The interest that this papyrus will spark stands as a great opportunity to share the true faith and to show the rich historical resources that Christianity possesses.  I hope this note equips you all to be more faithful witnesses in a culture of doubt.

God bless!


PS:  The Article I reference is here: